![]()
|
Case 157: Diabetic Foot: Osteomyelitis, Peripheral Neuropathy, Peripheral Arteriosclerosis Obliterans, Sepsis and Still Both Legs after 15 Years
At age 49 on the 25th of October 1985, this male diabetic
presented in the office for another opinion. A culture was taken, vascular
tests performed and a sample treatment with the Mini-boot administered along
with an injection of gentamicin into the bed of his ulcer. Hospital admission
was recommended and deferred for four days. On October 29th, he was admitted to
the Bryn Mawr Hospital for the first time. He presented with a large plantar
foot ulcer that had begun with a cut he had incurred on the beach the summer of
1984. He sought care from his family doctor and then a general surgeon. Their
antibiotics and outpatient therapies were not effective. He was then
hospitalized for intravenous antibiotics and bedrest and discharged again on
oral antibiotics. The foot did not heal. His physicians attended his ulcer over
the next year as an outpatient. In August of 1985, he developed a "massive
cellulitis" of the foot again leading to hospitalization, debridements and
bone biopsy. He was given intravenous Tobramycin for a month and again
discharged with an open ulcer and a prescription for Duracef. Unhappy with his
fate, he sought opinions from various clinics and institutions around
Philadelphia. One podiatry Professor urged immediate hospitalization, vascular
evaluation, long term antibiotic therapy and a two-stage reconstruction of his
dislocated big toe with the thought that the dislocation caused the persistent
trophic ulceration on the bottom of his foot. It was in his search for another
opinion that he had come to our Boot Clinic.
|
|
|
|
|
He had weighed 108 lbs at age 10, 165 lbs at age 18 and 185 lbs
at age 25. He had reached 310 lbs at age 44. He presented now at 217 lbs well
above his ideal calculated weight of 160 lbs. He did not know how long he had
had diabetes. His usual medications included Benamid 500 mg twice daily,
Minipress 1 mg daily, and two injections of NPH insulin. He admitted to
drinking 8 ounces of beer a day. Clinical symptoms of neuropathy included his
lack of foot pain and impotence. His blood pressure was 170/95 supine and
148/86 standing. He had upper and lower dental plates. His ocular lenses were
slightly cloudy and he had moderately advanced diabetic retinopathy (red spots
and hemorrhages in both eyes and proliferative changes near the discs). Both
popliteal pulses and the right dorsalis pedis pulse were 1+. The left pedal pulses
were questionable-to-absent. On October 25th his toe ulcer was odoriferous and
"juicy" . Bubbles in the expressed drainage suggested
"gas". The culturette was easily introduced 1.75 cm through the ulcer
bed into the foot. Abundant Enterobacter cloacae was obtained. Position and
deep pain sensation were diminished and light touch sensation was absent
bilaterally. He had no foot pain.
|
|
He was treated with intravenous Tobramycin the first few hospital days along with local gentamicin injections into and around his first metatarsal-phalangeal joint. He received Mini-Boot therapy with his foot immersed in Sea Soaks and gentamicin. He was pleased to find that his foot swelling decreased more in the first few days of boot therapy than it had in his previous month of hospital care. An orthopedic consultant cut the extensor tendon of his first toe to successfully reduce the dorsal displacement of his toe. He was given a more aggressive insulin program and directions to test his sugar four times daily. Unfortunately, he began to feel good and insisted on leaving the hospital to return to work on November 8th.
He was erratic in coming for his outpatient treatments claiming to have important
business pressures that kept him on his feet. In late December, he developed
fever, headache and myalgias that he interpreted as "flu' and skipped his
treatments altogether. On January 4th, 1986 he developed an ecchymosis around
his right eye and a sensation as if he had been dealt a blow to the eye. On the
6th of January, he came to clinic feeling especially sick and was admitted for
sepsis.
|
|
Blood cultures grew out Staphylococcus aureus. Our orthopedic
consultant placed a Penrose drain through the plantar ulcer, between the first
and second metatarsal heads and out the purple spot on the dorsum of the foot.
He was given steroids, intravenous vancomycin and higher dosages of insulin.
His usual Boot treatments were resumed and he improved. The physicians on the
boot service went on a ski vacation and in their absence a general internist
and an infectious disease consultant followed his case. They recommended
radical surgical debridement and at least four weeks of inhospital intravenous
antibiotic treatment. He refused their recommendations. He continued to improve
and signed out against physician's advice so that he could be near his desk at
work.
Indeed, he became a good outpatient and his foot did well. He stopped his treatment,
however, before his final pictures were taken. He sought care of his diabetes
and routine podiatry closer to home. In May of 1991 he developed another foot
ulcer. He was given oral antibiotics with no success. He was again hospitalized
for intravenous antibiotics again with no success in healing his ulcer. His
surgeon provided him with Cipro for the next ten months. Finally on May 13th,
1992 he developed "flu" symptoms reminding him of his previous
episode of sepsis. He came to Bryn Mawr and was hospitalized on May 16th, 1992.
|
|
|
His pedal pulses were again absent. A culture probe was admitted
into the base of his ulcer and easily advanced perhaps two inches in the
direction of the big toe. His Doppler waveforms were again abnormal but
present... and modest PPG tracings could be made from his big toe. A vascular
surgery consultation was deemed inappropriate.
|
|
His glycohemoglobin level of 13.6% on admission pointed to
poor recent glycemic control. Serial cultures grew abundant Alpha streptococci,
few Enterococci, few Staphylococcus aureus and some Candida albicans. His foot x-ray
showed possible osteomyelitis of the proximal phalanx of the 2nd toe. He was
treated with intravenous Vancomycin and later Ancef. One or both vancomycin and
Ancef were injected into his ulcer bed before his daily boot therapy. In
addition, his foot was pumped in the Mini-Boot while immersed in Sea Soaks
containing gentamicin and amphotericin-B. He was discharged to office care on
June 27, 1992.
|
|
|
|
|
|
He retired and began paying more attention to his diabetes with good results. Laboratory tests included an EKG November 1999 showing atrial fibrillation and an old inferior myocardial infarction; BUN 25 and creatinine 1.2 mg/dl in July 2000; and a glycohemoglobin A1C of 5.8% in September, 2000. His eyes and body, however, witnessed his many years of less well-controlled diabetes.
On November 28th, 2000, he presented again with
infected foot ulcers. His Insurance company was advised standard care would
require immediate hospitalization and intravenous antibiotics, which, in view
of his past history, we did not expect to be successful. Instead, we offered
outpatient Boot therapy and local antibiotics. They agreed to cover his
treatments. A heavy growth of Enterococcus species (sensitive only to
penicillin and vancomycin) and lesser growths of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia
(sensitive to ceftazidime, trimeth-sulfa, and ticarcillin) and
Coagulase-negative staphylococci (sensitive to gentamicin, Cipro, clindamycin,
trimeth-sulfa, and vancomycin) were grown from the blister drainage. He was
begun on local injections of gentamicin and Vancomycin along with oral
Augmentin. In view of his leg swelling, he was treated with bilateral Long
Circulator Boots. Before each boot session, he was given a dilute hydrogen
peroxide Sea Soaks foot wash and his local antibiotic injections.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comments: A man given to excesses:
weight, work and beer. A man probably not compliant with his other doctors, who
were, however, able to keep him in the hospital longer then we could. When we
improved his status, he chose to leave the hospital for outpatient treatment.
Unfortunately, he was not reliable in attending to his outpatient therapy. When
he did, he did well. He broke every "rule" preached by those
advocating bypass surgery, surgical debridements and long term intravenous
antibiotic therapy. Are these "rules" founded in good controlled
clinical research or do they merely relate to a style of practice that has
worked for some physicians. It is obvious that these "rules" do not
apply if therapy with the Circulator Boots and local antibiotics are employed.
In recent years, he has become a well-controlled and compliant diabetic. He
remains a diabetic still with a significant tissue burden of disease. Boot
therapy helps him overcome these burdens. It may be noted that his insurance
company profited in allowing his last outpatient treatments: a successful
outcome gained at far less expense than the usual hospitalization.
Return to CBC Homepage
Return
to Menu of Case Histories
Next
Case




















